This section depicts what is missing inside RTS2. In states expected human (and other) investments, profile of people doing that and a brief description of the problem. If somebody will be interested in taking a problem and solve it, we will move it to extra page under ideas: namespace and provide a link there.
Expected costs: 1 student, 1-2 weeks
Profile: image processing, C++, Subversion
I have meteorite detection code for RTS2, however it is not integrated in RTS2. The task of the student would be to take the code, merge it with current RTS2-related pipelines, fix bugs and run it on our widefiled CCDs.
The work may be extended so that it would take advantage of the WCS (pixel→world) calibration to provide direct 3D resolved result if observed from more than a single camera.
Will be provided by Pi-of-the Sky, expected to be integrated by end of 2008.
Expected costs: 1-3 students, 2-6 months
Profile: GTK, PyGTK ideal, XML-RPC, Subversion, GUI design, user documentation
For description of XML-RPC interface, please see XML-RPC wiki page. Also see description of current GUI there.
As astronomers are strange beasts, it must be multi-platform (at least Windows + Linux, Mac highly recommended). We do not expect it will be feasible to code all as Web application - standalone application is preferred. The application might integrate various programmes (image display,..) with SAMP. We expect various team members will pick different areas.
What we expect:
Expected costs: 1-3 students, 2-6 months
Profile: Google Web Toolkit, Web interface design user documentation, Subversion
There is a prototype implementation of RTS2 web, which have some limited functionalities. I would like to see extension of this piece of software which should result in usable and useful WWW interface for RTS2.
Expected costs: 1 student, 3 months
Profile: computer science theory, C++, Subversion
We went through an interesting history none → SOAP → XML-RPC regarding external access to RTS2. I just recently read through Atom specification, which is widely used by Google (so that was not XML-RPC - my mistake) and do not know if that is what we wanted. I like few characteristics of Atom, but dislike few others (apparent lack of C++ library to handle Atom requests is most probably the most serious one). The tasks of this mainly theoretics work is in comparing those various possibilities, try/use simple implementation with RTS2 and compare them.
We need to improve database design. Current summary is given at there. Database was originally developed as a quick hack, and the project grows of the original scope. It is clear that we will need to improve our current design. The work should provide summary of a current state, and should try to draw a new design.